From: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
To: Michele Di Giorgio <michele.digiorgio@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Peter Feuerer <peter@piie.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: fix race condition when updating cooling device
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:51:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160606125113.GC2897@e104805> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464877531-2161-1-git-send-email-michele.digiorgio@arm.com>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:25:31PM +0100, Michele Di Giorgio wrote:
> When multiple thermal zones are bound to the same cooling device, multiple
> kernel threads may want to update the cooling device state by calling
> thermal_cdev_update(). Having cdev not protected by a mutex can lead to a race
> condition. Consider the following situation with two kernel threads k1 and k2:
>
> Thread k1 Thread k2
> ||
> || call thermal_cdev_update()
> || ...
> || set_cur_state(cdev, target);
> call power_actor_set_power() ||
> ... ||
> instance->target = state; ||
> cdev->updated = false; ||
> || cdev->updated = true;
> || // completes execution
> call thermal_cdev_update() ||
> // cdev->updated == true ||
> return; ||
> \/
> time
>
> k2 has already looped through the thermal instances looking for the deepest
> cooling device state and is preempted right before setting cdev->updated to
> true. Now, k1 runs, modifies the thermal instance state and sets cdev->updated
> to false. Then, k1 is preempted and k2 continues the execution by setting
> cdev->updated to true, therefore preventing k1 from performing the update.
> Notice that this is not an issue if k2 looks at the instance->target modified by
> k1 "after" it is assigned by k1. In fact, in this case the update will happen
> anyway and k1 can safely return immediately from thermal_cdev_update().
>
> This may lead to a situation where a thermal governor never updates the cooling
> device. For example, this is the case for the step_wise governor: when calling
> the function thermal_zone_trip_update(), the governor may always get a new state
> equal to the old one (which, however, wasn't notified to the cooling device) and
> will therefore skip the update.
>
> CC: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> CC: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> CC: Peter Feuerer <peter@piie.net>
> Reported-by: Toby Huang <toby.huang@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michele Di Giorgio <michele.digiorgio@arm.com>
> ---
> Protecting only the assignment of cdev->updated with mutexes may look
> suspicious, but it is necessary to guarantee synchronization and avoiding the
> situation described in the commit message.
>
> There are other two possible solutions.
>
> Moving the cdev->lock mutex outside thermal_cdev_update() and protect both the
> assignment and the function. This would work, but will probably cause many
> issues when updating all the modules that use thermal_cdev_update().
>
> The other solution is to make cdev->updated an atomic_t, change the if
> condition to an atomic_cmpxchg and extend the critical section to include the
> call to cdev->ops->set_cur_state().
True. In any case, the mutex needs to cover set_cur_state() in
thermal_cdev_update(). This fixes the race condition, so I'm happy
with it.
Reviewed-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
> drivers/thermal/fair_share.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 10 +++++++---
> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-06 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 14:25 [PATCH] thermal: fix race condition when updating cooling device Michele Di Giorgio
2016-06-06 12:51 ` Javi Merino [this message]
2016-06-27 8:54 ` Michele DiGiorgio
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-20 9:46 Michele Di Giorgio
2016-08-05 13:21 ` Michele DiGiorgio
2016-08-11 21:50 ` Peter Feuerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160606125113.GC2897@e104805 \
--to=javi.merino@arm.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michele.digiorgio@arm.com \
--cc=peter@piie.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).