From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:51:00 +0530 Message-ID: <20160609032100.GB9356@vireshk-i7> References: <31871585.32WEDJA5Kj@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:36066 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933992AbcFIDVF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 23:21:05 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b5so8341608pas.3 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 20:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31871585.32WEDJA5Kj@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , Srinivas Pandruvada , Linux Kernel Mailing List On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only > has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke > gov_cancel_work(). > > Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the > caller. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 19 +++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor callbacks and why weren't they applied yet :) -- viresh