Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work()

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

On 09-06-16, 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>
> >> There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only
> >> has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke
> >> gov_cancel_work().
> >>
> >> Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the
> >> caller.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   19 +++++++------------
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor callbacks
> > and why weren't they applied yet :)
> 
> They are in linux-next now, aren't they?

Yeah, they are in now.

-- 
viresh