From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] cpufreq / sched: Make schedutil access utilization data directly
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:43:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802144343.GC22472@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802142843.GF9332@graphite.smuckle.net>
On 02/08/16 07:28, Steve Muckle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:38:17AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > > Anyway one way that my patch differed was that I had used the flags
> > > > field to keep the behavior the same for both RT and DL.
> >
> > Do you mean "go to max" policy for both, until proper policies will be
> > implemented in the future?
>
> Yep.
>
OK, thanks for clarifying.
> > > That happens
> > > > later on in this series for RT but the DL policy is modified as above.
> > > > Can the DL policy be left as-is and discussed/modified in a separate
> > > > series?
> >
> > Not that we want to start discussing this point now, if we postpone the
> > change for later, but I just wanted to point out a difference w.r.t.
> > what the schedfreq thing was doing: it used to sum contributions from
> > the different classes, instead of taking the max. We probably never
> > really discussed on the list what is the right thing to do, though.
>
> Yeah I figured that was worth deferring into its own patchset/thread.
>
Right. Makes sense to me to defer this point.
Best,
- Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-31 23:31 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags and iowait boosting Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] cpufreq / sched: Make schedutil access utilization data directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 19:28 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-01 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02 10:38 ` Juri Lelli
2016-08-02 14:28 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02 14:43 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2016-08-08 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-31 23:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] cpufreq / sched: Drop cpufreq_trigger_update() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] cpufreq / sched: Check cpu_of(rq) in cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 7:29 ` Dominik Brodowski
2016-08-01 14:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 19:48 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-01 23:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] cpufreq / sched: Add flags argument to cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 7:33 ` Dominik Brodowski
2016-08-01 14:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 19:59 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-01 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02 1:36 ` Steve Muckle
2016-07-31 23:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] cpufreq / sched: UUF_IO flag to indicate iowait condition Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02 1:22 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02 22:02 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-04 2:24 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-04 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-04 22:09 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-05 23:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02 1:35 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02 23:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-04 4:18 ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-04 6:53 ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-06 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-09 17:16 ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-13 15:59 ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-19 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-20 1:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-20 6:40 ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-22 18:53 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-22 22:53 ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-23 3:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-23 4:08 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-23 4:50 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-23 17:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 15:26 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags and iowait boosting Doug Smythies
2016-08-01 16:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-08 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-08 13:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802144343.GC22472@e106622-lin \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).