From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:53:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824045359.GB8407@kozik-book> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92003780.FE55FOzMhP@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, August 20, 2016 05:40:49 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:08:01AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 19, 2016 03:26:21 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > It is useful to know the reason why cpufreq_update_util() has just
> > > > > been called and that can be passed as flags to cpufreq_update_util()
> > > > > and to the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data. However,
> > > > > doing that in addition to passing the util and max arguments they
> > > > > already take would be clumsy, so avoid it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead, use the observation that the schedutil governor is part
> > > > > of the scheduler proper, so it can access scheduler data directly.
> > > > > This allows the util and max arguments of cpufreq_update_util()
> > > > > and the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data to be replaced
> > > > > with a flags one, but schedutil has to be modified to follow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thus make the schedutil governor obtain the CFS utilization
> > > > > information from the scheduler and use the "RT" and "DL" flags
> > > > > instead of the special utilization value of ULONG_MAX to track
> > > > > updates from the RT and DL sched classes. Make it non-modular
> > > > > too to avoid having to export scheduler variables to modules at
> > > > > large.
> > > > >
> > > > > Next, update all of the other users of cpufreq_update_util()
> > > > > and the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > v1 -> v2: Do not check cpu_of(rq) against smp_processor_id() in
> > > > > cfs_rq_util_change().
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 5 --
> > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 -
> > > > > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 -
> > > > > include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++--
> > > > > kernel/sched/cpufreq.c | 2 -
> > > > > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 +-
> > > > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +----
> > > > > kernel/sched/rt.c | 4 +-
> > > > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 31 +++++------------
> > > > > 10 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > (...)
> > > >
> > > > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > > > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
> > > > > If in doubt, say N.
> > > > >
> > > > > config CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
> > > > > - tristate "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor"
> > > > > + bool "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor"
> > > >
> > > > If you change such symbols please remember to update also all the
> > > > defconfigs. Without the update they start to show errors.
> > >
> > > Are there defconfigs that use this particular one?
> >
> > Yes, ARM/multi_v7 and exynos were using this as module. Javier sent a
> > patch for that and should be switched to builtin in upcoming next [1].
> >
> > If you would like to base on top of that, let me know, so I would
> > prepare a tag.
>
> I wouldn't like to rebase, but I can pull that branch depending on how
> much more material there is on it.
Not much, I put only the fix m->y on a separate branch. Anyway if you
need it, here it is:
The following changes since commit 29b4817d4018df78086157ea3a55c1d9424a7cfc:
Linux 4.8-rc1 (2016-08-07 18:18:00 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-defconfig-schedutil-4.9
for you to fetch changes up to 08023fb9cec03ee2992df51fa728c3f14a1ba0ea:
ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module (2016-08-19 17:50:13 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
The schedutil cpufreq governor will be switched from tristate to bool. Fix
defconfigs.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Javier Martinez Canillas (2):
ARM: exynos_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module
ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module
arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-24 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-12 0:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-12 0:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-15 22:15 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-19 13:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-20 1:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-20 15:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-22 17:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-24 4:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-08-12 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass runqueue pointer " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-15 22:16 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-16 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments Viresh Kumar
2016-08-16 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160824045359.GB8407@kozik-book \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox