From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: at91: properly handle LPDDR poweroff Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:17:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20161012111704.5mhtu4pjv2vncam5@piout.net> References: <20161007163427.11454-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1791580.DIVsjjyavb@ws-stein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1791580.DIVsjjyavb@ws-stein> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Alexander Stein Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 10/10/2016 at 08:00:30 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote : > Hi Alexandre, > > On Friday 07 October 2016 18:34:25, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This patch set improves LPDDR support on SoCs using the Atmel MPDDR > > controller. > > > > LPDDR memoris can only handle up to 400 uncontrolled power offs in their > > life. The proper power off sequence has to be applied before shutting down > > the SoC. > > > > I'm not too happy with the code duplication but this is a design choice > > that has been made before because both shitdown controler are really > ^^^^^^^^ > > I guess you mean shutdown? :) Same for the suject of 2nd patch. > I'm planning to send a v2, hopefully fixing my typos ;) -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com