From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Switch to the DT cpufreq policy on the Integrator
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:50:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161020042012.GI11766@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476871154-32243-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On 19-10-16, 11:59, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This switches the ARM Integrator/AP and Integrator/CP to use the
> Device Tree cpufreq policy with its definition of operating points
> using the generic OPP library.
>
> The Integrators does not need to control a regulator to switch
> frequency, only a clock. This clock and its device tree bindings
> have been defined in the device tree and merged upstream for v4.9.
>
> This approach provides a little better granularity on the
> Integrator/AP where I defined a few operating points: before
> this change the Integrator would just switch between min speed
> (12 MHz) and max speed (71 MHz). Now it can switch between a
> few arbitrarily chosen OPPs as in the examples below:
>
> The following tests were made on the Integrator/AP:
>
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0 echo ondemand > scaling_governor
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 71000000 Hz --> 24000000 Hz
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 24000000 Hz --> 12000000 Hz
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 12000000 Hz --> 24000000 Hz
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 24000000 Hz --> 12000000 Hz
>
> The switch from 12 to 24 MHz is triggered by as little as using the
> command line with the ondemand governor. If we do this:
>
> yes > /dev/null &
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 12000000 Hz --> 36000000 Hz
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 36000000 Hz --> 71000000 Hz
> pkill yes
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 71000000 Hz --> 12000000 Hz
>
> So the algorithm is indeed using all the OPPs.
>
> Also as a confirmation test to make sure performance is affected by the
> speed changes, we set the performance governor and:
>
> echo 12000 > scaling_max_freq
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 71000000 Hz --> 12000000 Hz
> time find /sys|sort|uniq > /dev/null
> real 0m 45.51s
> user 0m 11.15s
> sys 0m 26.74s
>
> echo 71000 > scaling_max_freq
> cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: switching OPP: 12000000 Hz --> 71000000 Hz
> time find /sys|sort|uniq
> > /dev/null
> real 0m 9.13s
> user 0m 2.35s
> sys 0m 5.50s
>
> So it is working.
>
> If people are happy with this approach and approve of the patches
> I'd like an ACK from the cpufreq people and then merge the whole set
> through ARM SoC.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-20 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 9:59 [PATCH 0/5] Switch to the DT cpufreq policy on the Integrator Linus Walleij
2016-10-19 9:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: enable the DT cpufreq driver on the Integrators Linus Walleij
2016-10-19 9:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: Add Integrator/AP cpus node and operating points Linus Walleij
2016-10-19 9:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: Add Integrator/CP " Linus Walleij
2016-10-19 9:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: defconfig: turn on the DT cpufreq for Integrator Linus Walleij
2016-10-19 9:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: retire the Integrator cpufreq driver Linus Walleij
2016-10-19 10:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] Switch to the DT cpufreq policy on the Integrator Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-24 19:28 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-24 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-25 7:16 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-19 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-20 4:20 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-10-20 4:47 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161020042012.GI11766@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).