From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/8] PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage() Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:14:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20161024231453.GS26139@codeaurora.org> References: <5f5f81da4b9773854fba72359cb911d2660e2957.1476952750.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5f5f81da4b9773854fba72359cb911d2660e2957.1476952750.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , nm@ti.com, Viresh Kumar , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , robh@kernel.org, d-gerlach@ti.com, broonie@kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Pass the entire supply structure instead of all of its fields. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- This patch should be combined with the previous one. I'm still not sure if it even makes sense to do this though. Do we really have to make duplicate "OPP snapshot" structures just because of how OPPs use RCU? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project