linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	nm@ti.com, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	robh@kernel.org, d-gerlach@ti.com, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/8] PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_opp_set_rate()
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:59:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161025185907.GU26139@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <219e9ed658b4cef58ffeed09ac36af20523c7a46.1476952750.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Later patches would add support for custom opp_set_rate callbacks. This

I know the OPP consumer function has "rate" in the name, but it
makes more sense to call the callback set_opp instead because we
could be doing a lot more than setting the opp rate.

> patch separates out the code for generic opp_set_rate handler in order
> to prepare for that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> index 45c70ce07864..96f04392daef 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> @@ -596,6 +596,73 @@ static int _set_opp_voltage(struct device *dev, struct regulator *reg,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int
> +_generic_opp_set_rate_clk_only(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk,
> +			       unsigned long old_freq, unsigned long freq)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Change frequency */
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "%s: switching OPP: %lu Hz --> %lu Hz\n",
> +		__func__, old_freq, freq);

Perhaps this should stay at the beginning of OPP transitions?
Otherwise it can get confusing when multiple switching OPP
messages appear on OPP transition failures.

> +
> +	ret = clk_set_rate(clk, freq);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to set clock rate: %d\n", __func__,
> +			ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h b/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h
> index d3f0861f9bff..6629c53c0aa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h
> @@ -47,22 +47,6 @@ extern struct list_head opp_tables;
>   */
>  
>  /**
> - * struct dev_pm_opp_supply - Power supply voltage/current values
> - * @u_volt:	Target voltage in microvolts corresponding to this OPP
> - * @u_volt_min:	Minimum voltage in microvolts corresponding to this OPP
> - * @u_volt_max:	Maximum voltage in microvolts corresponding to this OPP
> - * @u_amp:	Maximum current drawn by the device in microamperes
> - *
> - * This structure stores the voltage/current values for a single power supply.
> - */
> -struct dev_pm_opp_supply {
> -	unsigned long u_volt;
> -	unsigned long u_volt_min;
> -	unsigned long u_volt_max;
> -	unsigned long u_amp;
> -};
> -
> -/**
>   * struct dev_pm_opp - Generic OPP description structure
>   * @node:	opp table node. The nodes are maintained throughout the lifetime
>   *		of boot. It is expected only an optimal set of OPPs are
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index 0606b70a8b97..73713a8424b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
>  
> +struct clk;

Is struct regulator also forward declared?

>  struct dev_pm_opp;
>  struct device;
>  
> @@ -24,6 +25,36 @@ enum dev_pm_opp_event {
>  	OPP_EVENT_ADD, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, OPP_EVENT_ENABLE, OPP_EVENT_DISABLE,
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct dev_pm_opp_supply - Power supply voltage/current values
> + * @u_volt:	Target voltage in microvolts corresponding to this OPP
> + * @u_volt_min:	Minimum voltage in microvolts corresponding to this OPP
> + * @u_volt_max:	Maximum voltage in microvolts corresponding to this OPP
> + * @u_amp:	Maximum current drawn by the device in microamperes
> + *
> + * This structure stores the voltage/current values for a single power supply.
> + */
> +struct dev_pm_opp_supply {
> +	unsigned long u_volt;
> +	unsigned long u_volt_min;
> +	unsigned long u_volt_max;
> +	unsigned long u_amp;
> +};

This structure moved during this series. Can we avoid that and
already have it in the right place to begin with?

> +
> +struct dev_pm_opp_info {
> +	unsigned long rate;
> +	struct dev_pm_opp_supply *supplies;
> +};
> +
> +struct dev_pm_set_rate_data {

dev_pm_set_opp_data?

> +	struct dev_pm_opp_info old_opp;
> +	struct dev_pm_opp_info new_opp;
> +
> +	struct regulator **regulators;
> +	unsigned int regulator_count;
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +};

The above two structures don't get kernel doc?

> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PM_OPP)
>  
>  unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(struct dev_pm_opp *opp);
> -- 
> 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
> 

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-25 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-20  8:44 [PATCH V2 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device Viresh Kumar
     [not found]   ` <891ef8705e13dff331a3135647f4c18f88402a12.1476952750.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-24 22:48     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] PM / OPP: Don't use OPP structure outside of rcu protected section Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 22:52   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-25  3:37     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structure Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 23:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-25  3:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 20:26       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  3:34         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-10-21 22:32   ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-24  3:35     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 16:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:05     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10  1:37       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 18:59   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-10-26  6:07     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom opp_set_rate() callbacks Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 19:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:07     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] PM / OPP: Don't WARN on multiple calls to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 19:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-21 13:39 ` [PATCH V2 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-21 15:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24  1:08     ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-24  4:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 21:13         ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-26  3:21           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161025185907.GU26139@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).