From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [Discussion] Performance levels of power domains Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:58:08 +0530 Message-ID: <20161027082808.GD10423@vireshk-i7> References: <7hvawfq6kh.fsf@baylibre.com> <20161027034638.GA10423@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:33819 "EHLO mail-pf0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936192AbcJ0PfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:35:05 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n85so20042036pfi.1 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Kevin Hilman , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ulf Hansson , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , "Nayak, Rajendra" , Georgi Djakov , Lists linaro-kernel , Mark Brown On 27-10-16, 09:17, Vincent Guittot wrote: > The M3 core takes only care of the voltage but not the clock ? Yes. The is handled normally. > Just to be sure to understand the problem: > -There is no real voltage value but instead an opaque index that has > to be used with frequency instead of a voltage. > -This index is used by the M3 core to set voltages but M3 core doesn't > set the clock which is managed by Linux. > -The M3 core takes only one index input for the whole voltage domain > and Linux must aggregate the constraints (with probably a max policy) > of all devices that belong this domain > > Am i missing something ? No. All matches to my understanding of the problem. -- viresh