From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@arm.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:52:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161114102254.GD4178@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161114092252.GT3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 14-11-16, 10:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Any static prio value is wrong (static prio assignment requires system
> knowledge that the kernel doesn't and cannot have), 50 is what threaded
> IRQs default too as well IIRC, so it would at least be consistent with
> that.
Yes you are correct and I have found a better way of defining the
priority in this case using that code instead of magic figure 50.
MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2 :)
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 10:22 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar
2016-11-11 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: schedutil: enable fast switch earlier Viresh Kumar
2016-11-11 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-11 22:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-12 5:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-13 14:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-14 4:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-14 11:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-11 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar
2016-11-11 14:32 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2016-11-11 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-12 5:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-14 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-14 10:22 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-11-12 5:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-11 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-12 1:31 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-11-12 5:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-14 5:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-13 14:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-13 19:47 ` Steve Muckle
2016-11-13 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-14 6:36 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-12 5:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-13 19:31 ` Steve Muckle
2016-11-11 10:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work is used only in slow path Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161114102254.GD4178@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=Juri.Lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
--cc=smuckle.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).