public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	robh@kernel.org, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [TEST PATCH] WIP: Test OPP multi regulator support with ti-opp-domain driver
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:57:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161116032749.GE17245@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115221059.31629-1-d-gerlach@ti.com>

Thanks for this Dave :)

On 15-11-16, 16:10, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> NOT FOR MERGE!
> 
> Introduce a test version of a 'ti-opp-domain' driver that will use new
> multiple regulator support introduced to the OPP core by Viresh [1].
> Tested on v4.9-rc1 with that series applied.  This is needed on TI
> platforms like DRA7/AM57 in order to control both CPU regulator and
> Adaptive Body Bias (ABB) regulator as described by Nishanth Menon here
> [2]. These regulators must be scaled in sequence during an OPP
> transition depending on whether or not the frequency is being scaled up
> or down. Based on the new functionality provided by Viresh this driver
> does the following:
> 
> * Call dev_pm_opp_set_regulators with the names of the two regulators
>   that feed the CPU:
> 	* vdd is the 'cpu-supply' commonly used for cpufreq-dt but
> 	  renamed so the cpufreq-dt driver doesn't use it directly.
> 	  Note that this is supplied in board dts as it's external to
> 	  SoC.

I think I can fix this somehow.. Lemme check.

> 	* vbb for the ABB regulator. This is provided in SoC dtsi as it
> 	  is internal to the SoC.
> * Provide a platform set_opp function using
>   dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper that is called when an OPP
>   transition is requested.
> * Allow cpufreq-dt to probe which will work because no cpu-supply
>   regulator is found so the driver proceeds and calls
>   dev_pm_opp_set_rate which through the OPP core invokes the platform
>   set_opp call we provided
> * Platform set_opp call provided by this driver checks to see if we are
>   scaling frequency up or down and based on this, scales vbb before vdd
>   for up or the other way around for down.
> 
> In addition to that, this driver implements AVS Class 0 as described in
> section 18.4.6.12 of AM572x TRM [3] using the same platform set_rate
> hook added to the OPP core. There are registers that define the optimal
> voltage for that specific piece of silicon for an OPP so this driver
> simply looks up this optimal value and programs that for an OPP instead
> of the nominal value.
> 
> Missing from this is a good way to ensure that cpufreq-dt does not just
> proceed if no cpu-supply regulator is found but we were intending to
> rely on a platform set_opp and multiple regulators.
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=147746362402994&w=2
> [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=145684495832764&w=2
> [3] http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruhz6g/spruhz6g.pdf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15-common.dtsi |   2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi                     |  46 ++-
>  drivers/soc/ti/Makefile                         |   2 +
>  drivers/soc/ti/ti-opp-domain.c                  | 427 ++++++++++++++++++++++++

I would rather ask you to move this to drivers/base/power/opp/ 

-- 
viresh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-16  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-26  6:32 [PATCH V3 0/9] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device Viresh Kumar
2016-11-09 14:58   ` Mark Brown
2016-11-10  4:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10 16:36       ` Mark Brown
2016-11-10 18:09         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10 22:51           ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-11  3:11             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-15  1:59               ` Rob Herring
2016-11-15  2:13                 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-15  3:31                   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-15 18:56                     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-15 22:11                       ` Dave Gerlach
2016-11-16  3:18                         ` Viresh Kumar
     [not found]                       ` <20161115185645.GA25626-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-16  3:08                         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 2/9] PM / OPP: Don't use OPP structure outside of rcu protected section Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 3/9] PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structure Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 4/9] PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 5/9] PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 6/9] PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 7/9] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom set_opp() callbacks Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 8/9] PM / OPP: Don't WARN on multiple calls to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 9/9] PM / OPP: Don't assume platform doesn't have regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10  1:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-10  5:16     ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2016-11-02  4:51 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10  1:19   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-10  4:11     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-15 22:10 ` [TEST PATCH] WIP: Test OPP multi regulator support with ti-opp-domain driver Dave Gerlach
2016-11-16  1:38   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16  2:01   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16  3:27   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-11-18  3:06 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-11-18 10:43   ` Mark Brown
2016-11-22  3:49     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-22 18:41       ` Mark Brown
2016-11-23  3:46         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-23 12:29           ` Mark Brown
2016-11-24  5:07             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-24 10:19               ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161116032749.GE17245@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox