From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] PM / OPP: Pass opp_table to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:00:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20161130220019.GK6095@codeaurora.org> References: <480ae6e161788d338fb1637aa2615a75588ac3c6.1480478081.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <79cd13ecd7fae57d8afb0c73106ae071c665bf66.1480502882.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79cd13ecd7fae57d8afb0c73106ae071c665bf66.1480502882.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , jy0922.shim@samsung.com, Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , "# v4 . 4+" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 11/30, Viresh Kumar wrote: > From: Stephen Boyd > > Joonyoung Shim reported an interesting problem on his ARM octa-core > Odoroid-XU3 platform. During system suspend, dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() > was failing for a struct device for which dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() is > called earlier. > > This happened because an earlier call to > dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() function (from cpufreq-dt.c file) > removed all the entries from opp_table->dev_list apart from the last CPU > device in the cpumask of CPUs sharing the OPP. > > But both dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() > routines get CPU device for the first CPU in the cpumask. And so the OPP > core failed to find the OPP table for the struct device. > > This patch attempts to fix this problem by returning a pointer to the > opp_table from dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and using that as the > parameter to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(). This ensures that the > dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() doesn't fail to find the opp table. > > Note that similar design problem also exists with other > dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs, but those aren't used currently by anyone and > so we don't need to update them for now. > > [Viresh]: Written commit log and tested on exynos 5250. > > Cc: # v4.4+ > Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- You should have asked for my Signed-off-by instead of just adding it. Here it is to make things explicit and recorded: Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd Thanks for putting everything together and simplifying the error case. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project