From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindings Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:17:22 -0800 Message-ID: <20161207011722.GJ4388@codeaurora.org> References: <1f876a6d176784f9ab901aea7ff521d53522682d.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33514 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751180AbcLGBSP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:18:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1f876a6d176784f9ab901aea7ff521d53522682d.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot On 12/06, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The code adding static OPPs for V2 bindings already does so. Make the V1 > bindings specific code behave the same. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd It looks like that goes back to the original DT OPP binding support written by Shawn Guo. Any idea why we kept trying to add more OPPs if it failed to add one? Best effort or something? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project