linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rate
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:21:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161207012141.GL4388@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1da9ba0dd518f51fa73ca33e06ba868a267fb5d6.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 12/06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> There is only one user of dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and that uses it
> to get the OPP rate for the suspend_opp.
> 
> Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() as dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq()
> and return the rate directly from it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c  |  7 +------
>  include/linux/pm_opp.h        |  6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> index 6bcbb64a5582..6fd098618683 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> @@ -328,32 +328,31 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency(struct device *dev)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency);
>  
>  /**
> - * dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() - Get suspend opp
> + * dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq() - Get frequency of suspend opp

Please indicate units of frequency.

>   * @dev:	device for which we do this operation
>   *
> - * Return: This function returns pointer to the suspend opp if it is
> - * defined and available, otherwise it returns NULL.
> - *
> - * Locking: This function must be called under rcu_read_lock(). opp is a rcu
> - * protected pointer. The reason for the same is that the opp pointer which is
> - * returned will remain valid for use with opp_get_{voltage, freq} only while
> - * under the locked area. The pointer returned must be used prior to unlocking
> - * with rcu_read_unlock() to maintain the integrity of the pointer.
> + * Return: This function returns the frequency of the OPP marked as suspend_opp
> + * if one is available, else returns 0;
>   */
> -struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(struct device *dev)
> +unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct opp_table *opp_table;
> +	unsigned long freq = 0;
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	rcu_read_lock();
>  
>  	opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
>  	if (IS_ERR(opp_table) || !opp_table->suspend_opp ||
>  	    !opp_table->suspend_opp->available)
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto unlock;
>  
> -	return opp_table->suspend_opp;
> +	freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp_table->suspend_opp) / 1000;

Why do we include the / 1000? Perhaps we should just return freq
and have the caller divide.

> +
> +unlock:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return freq;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq);
>  
>  /**
>   * dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() - Get number of opps available in the opp table
> @@ -159,9 +159,9 @@ static inline unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency(struct device
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(struct device *dev)
> +static inline unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	return NULL;
> +	return 0;

Dividing 0 by anything is just 0 anyway.

>  }

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-06  9:15 [PATCH 00/10] PM / OPP: Fixes and cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 01/10] PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPs Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:09   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07  3:23     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 02/10] PM / OPP: Remove useless TODO Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:10   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07  3:24     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 03/10] PM / OPP: Rename _allocate_opp() to _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:10   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindings Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07  3:25     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 21:13       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-08  3:30         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-08  6:39           ` Shawn Guo
2016-12-08  6:45             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-08 14:27               ` Shawn Guo
2016-12-08 14:47                 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] PM / OPP: Add light weight _opp_free() routine Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:12   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] PM / OPP: Rename and split _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:19   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:02   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07  4:17     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 22:05       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-08  3:45         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-22  0:43           ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06  9:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rate Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:21   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-12-07  4:20     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06  9:16 ` [PATCH 09/10] PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiers Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:22   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06  9:16 ` [PATCH 10/10] PM / OPP: Split out part of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07  1:24   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07  4:25     ` Viresh Kumar
     [not found] ` <CGME20161206091647epcas4p1823f471816de0ef953123a8fbdac4b1f@epcas4p1.samsung.com>
2016-12-07  0:29   ` [PATCH 09/10] PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiers MyungJoo Ham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161207012141.GL4388@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).