From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] PM / OPP: Remove useless TODO Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:54:21 +0530 Message-ID: <20161207032421.GD31255@vireshk-i7> References: <1256ea9415bf9e6a4cf71b5b22e544e5b542a056.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20161207011008.GG4388@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:33986 "EHLO mail-pg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752618AbcLGDaZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 22:30:25 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id x23so156585940pgx.1 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:30:25 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161207011008.GG4388@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot On 06-12-16, 17:10, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 12/06, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > This TODO doesn't make sense anymore as we have all the information in a > > single OPP table. Remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > > Was this for multiple phandles style of binding that we never > merged? Yes, for something like slow and fast OPP tables. We solved that problem in a different way. -- viresh