From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rate
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:50:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161207042036.GG31255@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161207012141.GL4388@codeaurora.org>
On 06-12-16, 17:21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > There is only one user of dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and that uses it
> > to get the OPP rate for the suspend_opp.
> >
> > Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() as dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq()
> > and return the rate directly from it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 7 +------
> > include/linux/pm_opp.h | 6 +++---
> > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> > index 6bcbb64a5582..6fd098618683 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> > @@ -328,32 +328,31 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency(struct device *dev)
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency);
> >
> > /**
> > - * dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() - Get suspend opp
> > + * dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq() - Get frequency of suspend opp
>
> Please indicate units of frequency.
Sure.
> > * @dev: device for which we do this operation
> > *
> > - * Return: This function returns pointer to the suspend opp if it is
> > - * defined and available, otherwise it returns NULL.
> > - *
> > - * Locking: This function must be called under rcu_read_lock(). opp is a rcu
> > - * protected pointer. The reason for the same is that the opp pointer which is
> > - * returned will remain valid for use with opp_get_{voltage, freq} only while
> > - * under the locked area. The pointer returned must be used prior to unlocking
> > - * with rcu_read_unlock() to maintain the integrity of the pointer.
> > + * Return: This function returns the frequency of the OPP marked as suspend_opp
> > + * if one is available, else returns 0;
> > */
> > -struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(struct device *dev)
> > +unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct opp_table *opp_table;
> > + unsigned long freq = 0;
> >
> > - opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
> > if (IS_ERR(opp_table) || !opp_table->suspend_opp ||
> > !opp_table->suspend_opp->available)
> > - return NULL;
> > + goto unlock;
> >
> > - return opp_table->suspend_opp;
> > + freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp_table->suspend_opp) / 1000;
>
> Why do we include the / 1000? Perhaps we should just return freq
> and have the caller divide.
Stupid enough. Thanks for pointing out.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 9:15 [PATCH 00/10] PM / OPP: Fixes and cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 01/10] PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPs Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 3:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 02/10] PM / OPP: Remove useless TODO Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 3:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 03/10] PM / OPP: Rename _allocate_opp() to _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindings Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 3:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 21:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-08 3:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-08 6:39 ` Shawn Guo
2016-12-08 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-08 14:27 ` Shawn Guo
2016-12-08 14:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] PM / OPP: Add light weight _opp_free() routine Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:12 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] PM / OPP: Rename and split _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 4:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-08 3:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-22 0:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rate Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 4:20 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-12-06 9:16 ` [PATCH 09/10] PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiers Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:16 ` [PATCH 10/10] PM / OPP: Split out part of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 4:25 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20161206091647epcas4p1823f471816de0ef953123a8fbdac4b1f@epcas4p1.samsung.com>
2016-12-07 0:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiers MyungJoo Ham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161207042036.GG31255@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox