From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] PM / OPP: Split out part of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:55:03 +0530 Message-ID: <20161207042503.GH31255@vireshk-i7> References: <20161207012401.GN4388@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:34831 "EHLO mail-pf0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751953AbcLGEZH (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:25:07 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id i88so74256601pfk.2 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 20:25:07 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161207012401.GN4388@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot On 06-12-16, 17:24, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 12/06, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Split out parts of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() into > > separate routines. This will be useful going forward (while doing > > further cleanups). > > > > Should result in no functional changes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > > But perhaps this should wait until we have patches that actually > use them. Even if there are no more patches, it would be good to separate our allocation/removal to separate routines. Will update the commit log a bit and will include your Reviewed-by tag. Thanks. -- viresh