From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: Cpufreq regression in next-20161207 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:27:38 +0530 Message-ID: <20161208055738.GB31711@vireshk-i7> References: <20161208045640.GB4264@atomide.com> <20161208050739.GE24152@vireshk-i7> <20161208055220.GD4264@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:34342 "EHLO mail-pf0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750827AbcLHF5n (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 00:57:43 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c4so81811150pfb.1 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 21:57:43 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161208055220.GD4264@atomide.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Stephen Boyd , Dave Gerlach , Nishanth Menon , Tero Kristo , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 07-12-16, 21:52, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hmm good question. Maybe we don't have the regulators configured for > pandaboard? Hmm, and who would be the right person to confirm that? And its not only about pandaboard but the whole OMAP4 family (which is using cpufreq-dt driver). -- viresh