From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Cpufreq regression in next-20161207 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:04:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20161208060447.GE4264@atomide.com> References: <20161208045640.GB4264@atomide.com> <20161208050739.GE24152@vireshk-i7> <20161208055220.GD4264@atomide.com> <20161208055738.GB31711@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:53550 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800AbcLHGEw (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 01:04:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161208055738.GB31711@vireshk-i7> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Stephen Boyd , Dave Gerlach , Nishanth Menon , Tero Kristo , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Viresh Kumar [161207 21:58]: > On 07-12-16, 21:52, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hmm good question. Maybe we don't have the regulators configured for > > pandaboard? > > Hmm, and who would be the right person to confirm that? And its not only about > pandaboard but the whole OMAP4 family (which is using cpufreq-dt driver). Nishanth and Dave in Cc should be able to confirm. Most likely it's some missing .config option for the regulators in multi_v7_defconfig compared to omap2plus_defconfig though. Regards, Tony