From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume_latency for each cpu
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:09:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170111080927.GA6689@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483630187-29622-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:29:46PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> The cpu-dma PM QoS constraint impacts all the cpus in the system. There
> is no way to let the user to choose a PM QoS constraint per cpu.
>
> The following patch exposes to the userspace a per cpu based sysfs file
> in order to let the userspace to change the value of the PM QoS latency
> constraint.
>
> This change is inoperative in its form and the cpuidle governors have to
> take into account the per cpu latency constraint in addition to the
> global cpu-dma latency constraint in order to operate properly.
>
> BTW
> The pm_qos_resume_latency usage defined in
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-power
> The /sys/devices/.../power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us attribute
> contains the PM QoS resume latency limit for the given device,
> which is the maximum allowed time it can take to resume the
> device, after it has been suspended at run time, from a resume
> request to the moment the device will be ready to process I/O,
> in microseconds. If it is equal to 0, however, this means that
> the PM QoS resume latency may be arbitrary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/cpu.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 4c28e1a..29cf3459 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/cpufeature.h>
> #include <linux/tick.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
>
> #include "base.h"
>
> @@ -376,6 +377,9 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
>
> per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev;
> register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_GOV_MENU
> + dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev, 0);
> +#endif
No way to do this without the #ifdef? That's really not recommended for
.c code :(
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1483630187-29622-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org>
2017-01-05 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle/menu: stop seeking deeper idle if current state is too deep Alex Shi
2017-01-05 15:43 ` Rik van Riel
2017-01-05 15:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2017-01-05 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume_latency for each cpu Alex Shi
2017-01-11 8:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-01-11 14:33 ` Alex Shi
2017-01-11 18:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-01-12 13:04 ` Alex Shi
2017-01-05 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration Alex Shi
2017-01-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] per cpu resume latency Alex Shi
2017-01-10 8:02 ` Alex Shi
2017-01-19 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170111080927.GA6689@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).