From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gautham R Shenoy Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powernv:stop: Uniformly rename power9 to arch300 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:14:18 +0530 Message-ID: <20170113034418.GA10844@in.ibm.com> References: <1484039224-5630-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1484039224-5630-3-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170112094733.GC3006@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170112094733.GC3006@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Balbir Singh Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Michael Neuling , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , "Shreyas B. Prabhu" , Shilpasri G Bhat , Stewart Smith , Oliver O'Halloran , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , mark.rutland@arm.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:17:33PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > > > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some > > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others > > had arch300. > > > > I would prefer power9 to arch300 > I don't have a strong preference for arch300 vs power9, will change it to power9 if that looks better. -- Thanks and Regards gautham.