From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: reset: Add MAX77620 support Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:44:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20170120124404.wmlpiuqyizi7uhyi@earth> References: <20170112161507.23774-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20170113034425.7ttvc73aewtbitrk@earth> <20170119122357.GF30182@ulmo.ba.sec> <20170119230036.sjfqvqxgxutis6xs@earth> <20170119232934.GA18102@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tz5acogfm3x4beis" Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:34442 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751537AbdATMoL (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:44:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170119232934.GA18102@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Thierry Reding , Laxman Dewangan , Martin Michlmayr , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chaitanya Bandi --tz5acogfm3x4beis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:29:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:00:36AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > I actually have a set of patches somewhere which transforms the remaining > direct users of arm_pm_restart to use the framework (unless I removed it > from my trees - I don't really recall). I just never got around to submit > it, and then [2] happened and I lost interest. I found a patchset from you from 2016. I see a few Acks and no negative feedback. Looks like they only need to be uploaded at Russel's patch system? arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844441/ arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844481/ drivers/firmware/psci.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844411/ arch/arm/kernel/setup.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844451/ removal of ARM64 arm_pm_restart https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844471/ removal of ARM32 arm_pm_restart https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844391/ > > No such thing exists for poweroff. Guenter also wrote something for > > that [1], but Linus intervened [2]. Anyways, pm_power_off is at > > least architecture independent. > >=20 > That was by far the most frustrating kernel development experience > I ever head :-(. Sorry for the reminder. -- Sebastian --tz5acogfm3x4beis Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE72YNB0Y/i3JqeVQT2O7X88g7+poFAliCBhIACgkQ2O7X88g7 +poKThAAgg3Y6c7OzpVzxSfVwGsb1NYJk9B7hIeSW5lq5qs8oz06gsf0FYA5NYPC v1SBelyim6CQY4V83TlB1YTi7PqQRLWDBEOng7Cngt9G5SuXDMY+33OfANG8RD4N LcWohVTUnoDbRKr+YKk3tsoWSW4ttQKBOV3HKmDATpEBO1s3saL2feEWvUy9NQpm yfL+hWL8ALazxvZ5aLz4X/aRkGTKOttfj2KKxKi/4PZ5/5fcmYrN4RUtD+qZPS+u /dyKVXMiVOrtsC0lk6vZkRB7Tke30R9Nd6f+PJ0D3RNFJmWrlAFWwFStlOdhVKic TJU41zpxd2QaR2DbKdMCIf+t0cY7RYerLMSwsms0QySAkgM0x+k/0/dSBx3XkXNF TDTRpEYpJdoXz89Bk0yPb97JdNJTa1CuMEQb0uLf53ZJPLsCgn/V0ouyHHcYBKG8 TywzGViqOtxaqAIZXaicCFAyHrBORcjTr8ewhdqok4mwnCBsU4ibJQxxDWXvnVr0 uGNn4uLZi3Bn8bFSsQ1q9rpUtC2WHRIIidi6vNKTZZ6aqPqZjKZvexy1LHC/FM98 DUUvRU5oXCRiufI/FIkFVidWIm5+IU9fm2GZw8wXeLp24U7iQbZBPQeaJNHsiGp/ Fsi6M2b5l+l797n3LU4e7Li7LTvBKcDJeuCwKJdVXks9lfXiorg= =RVlC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tz5acogfm3x4beis--