From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC v4] ACPI throttling: Disable the MSR T-state if enabled after resumed
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:02:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170218090207.GB8937@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487320050-22894-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1930 bytes --]
On Fri 2017-02-17 16:27:30, Chen Yu wrote:
> Previously a bug was reported that on certain Broadwell
> platform, after resumed from S3, the CPU is running at
> an anomalously low speed, due to the BIOS has enabled the
> MSR throttling across S3. The solution to this was to introduce
> a quirk framework to save/restore tstate MSR register around
> suspend/resume, in Commit 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm:
> Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR
> registers around suspend/resume").
>
> However there are still three problems left:
> 1. More and more reports show that other platforms also
> encountered the same issue, so the quirk list might
> be endless.
> 2. Each CPUs should take the save/restore operation into
> consideration, rather than the boot CPU alone.
> 3. Normally ACPI T-state re-evaluation is done on resume,
> however there is no _TSS on the bogus platform, thus
> above re-evaluation code does not run on that machine.
>
> Solution:
> This patch is based on the fact that, we generally should not
> expect the system to come back from resume with throttling
> enabled, but leverage the OS components to deal with it,
> such as thermal event. So we simply clear the MSR T-state
> and print the warning if it is found to be enabled after
> resumed back. Besides, we can remove the quirk in previous patch
> later.
What if the machine _is_ hot?
> +static int acpi_throttling_init_ops(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Reevaluate on boot CPU. Since it is not always CPU0,
> + * we can not invoke throttling_msr_reevaluate(0) directly.
> + */
Boot cpu is not cpu#0? How can that be?
Should we introduce generic framework to "fix" all the cpus? Actually,
should this be done right on cpu hotplug?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-18 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 8:27 [PATCH][RFC v4] ACPI throttling: Disable the MSR T-state if enabled after resumed Chen Yu
2017-02-18 9:02 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-02-19 4:37 ` Chen Yu
2017-03-14 17:38 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-15 15:11 ` Chen Yu
2017-03-13 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-15 14:43 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170218090207.GB8937@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).