From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: schedutil: Redefine the rate_limit_us tunable
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:59:13 +0530
Message-ID: <20170224022913.GA17432@vireshk-i7>
References: <250f484b4fec4922601f18e719f587aa40c8b220.1487651965.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <CAJZ5v0h0pvsBtQJ=W0vfx7sUjaKeEgBoHjUzxgV_Fmk5d11toA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0h0pvsBtQJ=W0vfx7sUjaKeEgBoHjUzxgV_Fmk5d11toA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, eas-dev@lists.linaro.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On 24-02-17, 00:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'd prefer this to spend some time in linux-next before it goes into
> the mainline, so I will queue it up for 4.12 if no one objects by the
> end of the next week.

Sure. Thanks.

-- 
viresh