From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: YuanTian Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>
Cc: Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@nxp.com>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: enhance bus frequency calculation
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:09:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309093917.GB3341@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489047306-31818-1-git-send-email-andy.tang@nxp.com>
On 09-03-17, 16:15, YuanTian Tang wrote:
> From: Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@nxp.com>
>
> On some platforms, property device-type may be missed in soc node
> in dts which caused the bus-frequency can not be obtained correctly.
>
> This patch enhanced the bus-frequency calculation. When property
> device-type is missed in dts, bus-frequency will be obtained by
> looking up clock table to get platform clock and hence get its
> frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.tang@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c
> index bfec1bc..0f22e40 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c
> @@ -52,17 +52,27 @@ static u32 get_bus_freq(void)
> {
> struct device_node *soc;
> u32 sysfreq;
> + struct clk *pltclk;
> + int ret;
>
> + /* get platform freq by searching bus-frequency property */
> soc = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, "soc");
> - if (!soc)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (of_property_read_u32(soc, "bus-frequency", &sysfreq))
> - sysfreq = 0;
> + if (soc) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(soc, "bus-frequency", &sysfreq);
> + of_node_put(soc);
> + if (!ret)
> + return sysfreq;
> + }
>
> - of_node_put(soc);
> + /* get platform freq by its clock name */
> + pltclk = clk_get(NULL, "cg-pll0-div1");
Will this always work? If yes, then what about dropping the code parsing DT
completely ? That is, just rely on clk_get_rate() in all cases.
> + if (IS_ERR(pltclk)) {
> + pr_err("%s: can't get bus frequency %ld\n",
> + __func__, PTR_ERR(pltclk));
You need to properly align this. Try running checkpatch over this patch or:
checkpatch --strict
> + return PTR_ERR(pltclk);
> + }
>
> - return sysfreq;
> + return clk_get_rate(pltclk);
> }
>
> static struct clk *cpu_to_clk(int cpu)
> --
> 2.1.0.27.g96db324
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 8:15 [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: enhance bus frequency calculation YuanTian Tang
2017-03-09 9:39 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-03-10 1:44 ` Andy Tang
2017-03-10 10:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-10 10:12 ` Andy Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170309093917.GB3341@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=Yuantian.Tang@nxp.com \
--cc=andy.tang@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox