From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] cpufreq: schedutil: Allow remote wakeups Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:39:16 +0530 Message-ID: <20170316030916.GA5201@vireshk-i7> References: <4261790.UfzOU18DRK@aspire.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:33886 "EHLO mail-pg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751021AbdCPDJW (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:09:22 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 141so18055892pgd.1 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4261790.UfzOU18DRK@aspire.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , smuckle.linux@gmail.com, juri.lelli@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, eas-dev@lists.linaro.org On 15-03-17, 12:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From the first quick look patches [1-3/9] seem to be split out somewhat > artificially. > > Any chance to fold them into the patches where the new stuff is actually used? > > I'll be looking at the rest of the patchset shortly. I thought it would be better to keep them separate, but I can merge them to others in the next version if you want. -- viresh