From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:43:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170411174342.GC5528@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <707918c88ce650ea11d160e31965482cdebc9a39.1489640000.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3844 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:59:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> There is only one user of cpufreq_cooling_get_level() and that already
> has pointer to the cpufreq_dev structure. It can directly call
> get_level() instead and we can get rid of cpufreq_cooling_get_level().
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 33 +--------------------------------
> include/linux/cpu_cooling.h | 6 ------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index e2931c20c309..99dc6833de75 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -137,37 +137,6 @@ static unsigned long get_level(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_dev,
> }
>
> /**
> - * cpufreq_cooling_get_level - for a given cpu, return the cooling level.
> - * @cpu: cpu for which the level is required
> - * @freq: the frequency of interest
> - *
> - * This function will match the cooling level corresponding to the
> - * requested @freq and return it.
> - *
> - * Return: The matched cooling level on success or THERMAL_CSTATE_INVALID
> - * otherwise.
> - */
> -unsigned long cpufreq_cooling_get_level(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int freq)
> -{
> - struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_dev;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_dev, &cpufreq_dev_list, node) {
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus)) {
> - unsigned long level = get_level(cpufreq_dev, freq);
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock);
> - return level;
> - }
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock);
> -
> - pr_err("%s: cpu:%d not part of any cooling device\n", __func__, cpu);
> - return THERMAL_CSTATE_INVALID;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cooling_get_level);
> -
> -/**
> * cpufreq_thermal_notifier - notifier callback for cpufreq policy change.
> * @nb: struct notifier_block * with callback info.
> * @event: value showing cpufreq event for which this function invoked.
> @@ -698,7 +667,7 @@ static int cpufreq_power2state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> normalised_power = (dyn_power * 100) / last_load;
> target_freq = cpu_power_to_freq(cpufreq_dev, normalised_power);
>
> - *state = cpufreq_cooling_get_level(cpu, target_freq);
> + *state = get_level(cpufreq_dev, target_freq);
Did I miss something or we are loosing semantics here?
I guess the idea at this point is to get the level corresponding to the
frequency on a specific cpu. Let's have a look on get_level()..
I guess now we can rely on the freq table held in the
cpufreq_cooling_device..
> if (*state == THERMAL_CSTATE_INVALID) {
> dev_err_ratelimited(&cdev->device,
> "Failed to convert %dKHz for cpu %d into a cdev state\n",
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> index c156f5082758..96c5e4c2f9c8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
> */
> void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev);
>
> -unsigned long cpufreq_cooling_get_level(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int freq);
> #else /* !CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL */
> static inline struct thermal_cooling_device *
> cpufreq_cooling_register(const struct cpumask *clip_cpus)
> @@ -117,11 +116,6 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> {
> return;
> }
> -static inline
> -unsigned long cpufreq_cooling_get_level(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int freq)
> -{
> - return THERMAL_CSTATE_INVALID;
> -}
> #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL */
>
> #endif /* __CPU_COOLING_H__ */
> --
> 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-11 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 5:26 [PATCH 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 01/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structures Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 02/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globals Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 03/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace cpufreq_device with cpufreq_dev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:33 ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-04-12 6:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 04/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:35 ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 05/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level() Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:43 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2017-04-12 6:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 06/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 07/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 08/17] cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 09/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policy Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 10/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUs Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 11/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus' Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 12/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 13/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time stats Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 14/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't fail Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 15/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_dev Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 16/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 17/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_device Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 6:02 ` [PATCH 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170411174342.GC5528@localhost.localdomain \
--to=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).