From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/5] Add capacity capping support to the CPU controller Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20170412124822.GG3093@worktop> References: <1488292722-19410-1-git-send-email-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20170320145131.GA3623@htj.duckdns.org> <20170320172233.GA28391@e110439-lin> <20170410073622.2y6tnpcd2ssuoztz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170411175833.GI29455@e110439-lin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170411175833.GI29455@e110439-lin> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Bellasi Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Paul Turner , Vincent Guittot , John Stultz , Todd Kjos , Tim Murray , Andres Oportus , Joel Fernandes , Juri Lelli , Chris Redpath , Morten Rasmussen , Dietmar Eggemann List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:58:33PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > illustrated per your above points in that it affects both, while in > > fact it actually modifies another metric, namely util_avg. > > I don't see it modifying in any direct way util_avg. The point is that clamps called 'capacity' are applied to util. So while you don't modify util directly, you do modify the util signal (for one consumer).