From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/9] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:54:14 +0530 Message-ID: <20170412142414.GF5910@vireshk-i7> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rafael Wysocki , ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Kevin Hilman Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , Stephen Boyd , Nishanth Menon , robh+dt@kernel.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 20-03-17, 15:02, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > The main feedback I got for the V3 series came from Kevin, who suggested > that we should reuse OPP tables for genpd devices as well, instead of > creating a new table type. And that's what this version is trying to do. > > Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of > their power domains. The process of configuring the performance state is > pretty much platform dependent and we may need to work with a wide range > of configurables. For some platforms, like Qcom, it can be a positive > integer value alone, while in other cases it can be voltage levels, etc. > > The power-domain framework until now was only designed for the idle > state management of the device and this needs to change in order to > reuse the power-domain framework for active state management of the > devices. Hi Ulf/Kevin, Over 3 weeks since the time this version was posted :( Can we get some reviews of this stuff and decide on how we are supposed to proceed on this ? Its getting delayed a lot unnecessarily. Thanks. -- viresh