From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] power: supply: bq24190_charger: Use new extcon_register_notifier_all() Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 01:44:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20170413234448.stxmxvnemldzjyq3@earth> References: <20170413120412.12773-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20170413120412.12773-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20170413233526.ebtytz54d3ux2oze@earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="snsx3ck2qaekxveb" Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:46316 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752822AbdDMXox (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:44:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170413233526.ebtytz54d3ux2oze@earth> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Hans de Goede , MyungJoo Ham , Chanwoo Choi Cc: Takashi Iwai , Liam Breck , Tony Lindgren , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --snsx3ck2qaekxveb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 01:35:26AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 02:04:11PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > When I submitted the extcon handling I had a patch pending for the > > extcon sub-system for extcon_register_notifier to take -1 as cable id > > for listening for all type cable events on an extcon with a single > > notifier. > >=20 > > In the end it was decided to instead add a new > > extcon_register_notifier_all function for this, switch to using this. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > > Acked-by: Liam Breck >=20 > With extcon_register_notifier_all() being new and not available > in my tree I can't simply queue this patch. Also it can't simply > go through the extcon subsystem, since it depends on changes in > the power-supply subsystem and results in non-trivial merge conflict. > I see three merge solutions: >=20 > 1. Defer to 4.13 (since we are already quite near the merge window) > 2. I need a immutable branch with extcon_register_notifier_all() > from the extcon subsystem > 3. It may count as Fix and could be queued during the 4.12-rc > phase based von 4.12-rc1 Sorry for the noise, I just saw the immutable branch in the cover mail. I will queue this now. Unfortunately it means rebasing the power-supply tree to 4.11-rc4 (or ugly merge, which is annoying in the pull-request). Chanwoo, please try to use -rc1 as base for immutable branches in the future. -- Sebastian --snsx3ck2qaekxveb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE72YNB0Y/i3JqeVQT2O7X88g7+poFAljwDXAACgkQ2O7X88g7 +prBjA/+IHqjRTqrfCBxRAiQ+skMpEia34ClAK2++P29t+jIlIMSoAHTmfhUj9xX H9iW1ckm0TJTb6Qcayn9lmyIJPF/RO+J69kGdIY6lbCPXhSOrsXSwXuv+8ItxCd+ r4QjuuXM46UalNoGJa7V/cT5GGgLpPHHYkbZ8Pjck8LpXjDdnsWFEleHO5ZKtt+/ pBKh2089CSefcXZnjWMK7sODE6peQxOgIMJb37Fh8y/tCd91JQpftl/XHWaBMBIt 3xZTQSdiFJ2yHQPQSLYhH97NSTgjwu+XF8vja1PFqqdlLnaIEty7zguWD8beMamX GVvsrgVSeIJC3fcOdcP2+3O1OWqX/AqrIm/yGPZBf2x5LCvESocA7HMhBpeM5dvM pkMH5wzDQmWIX5hVMMqlwGX4npu+sGM4+E6+gcIW5dCeVouXlraxPvyQfsW9SAzt 62UflNKdMhjqYrymPGrqIjDIEku5sZl5nm2x4tBR+OEm3y8/yzpVWDoztdBDscHX P/DPOqy6QBeHEjolmEfm9aRqteiGj61wbP2/++Kdniuz7aIyl0AYn8OcJmx2+uwG H90J0f0ZHuZdRf8VhItcjW/HSHo/NKVceYmkduBDH6lUMtSW3solTPybX2nqH4EX P5gG1mwXhD92DBP3AW0zA2aIFhBgCU07MVlSNnG/9weXdMY3t+4= =Ai/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --snsx3ck2qaekxveb--