From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch V2 06/24] cpufreq: Use cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked()
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 19:04:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418170552.865966021@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20170418170442.665445272@linutronix.de
[-- Attachment #1: cpufreq-Use-cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_locked.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1630 bytes --]
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
cpufreq holds get_online_cpus() while invoking cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls()
to make subsys_interface_register() and the registration of hotplug calls
atomic versus cpu hotplug.
cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() invokes get_online_cpus() as well. This is
correct, but prevents the conversion of the hotplug locking to a percpu
rwsem.
Use cpuhp_setup/remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked() to avoid the nested call.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2473,9 +2473,10 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufr
goto err_if_unreg;
}
- ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "cpufreq:online",
- cpuhp_cpufreq_online,
- cpuhp_cpufreq_offline);
+ ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
+ "cpufreq:online",
+ cpuhp_cpufreq_online,
+ cpuhp_cpufreq_offline);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_if_unreg;
hp_online = ret;
@@ -2519,7 +2520,7 @@ int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpu
get_online_cpus();
subsys_interface_unregister(&cpufreq_interface);
remove_boost_sysfs_file();
- cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(hp_online);
+ cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(hp_online);
write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20170418170442.665445272@linutronix.de>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170418170552.865966021@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).