public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/9] PM / QOS: Add DEV_PM_QOS_PERFORMANCE request
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:04:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420043402.GE5436@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqH3PHeZ0T_63VgGRy_AUuDJ8WUCCovNRvBM2KCTJpG7g@mail.gmail.com>

On 19-04-17, 16:07, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 20 March 2017 at 10:32, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > @@ -571,6 +589,9 @@ static void __dev_pm_qos_drop_user_request(struct device *dev,
> >                 req = dev->power.qos->flags_req;
> >                 dev->power.qos->flags_req = NULL;
> >                 break;
> > +       case DEV_PM_QOS_PERFORMANCE:
> > +               dev_err(dev, "Invalid user request (performance)\n");
> > +               return;
> 
> Isn't it possible to drop a performance request?

I am not exposing the performance QOS via sysfs. Should we ? I thought
this has to be worked out within kernel only and so haven't provided
any user interface.

> > @@ -96,9 +98,11 @@ struct pm_qos_flags {
> >  struct dev_pm_qos {
> >         struct pm_qos_constraints resume_latency;
> >         struct pm_qos_constraints latency_tolerance;
> > +       struct pm_qos_constraints performance;
> >         struct pm_qos_flags flags;
> >         struct dev_pm_qos_request *resume_latency_req;
> >         struct dev_pm_qos_request *latency_tolerance_req;
> > +       struct dev_pm_qos_request *performance_req;
> 
> I didn't find performance_req being used at all...

I just over-copied it seems. The OPP framework creates its own request
structure and so this should be dropped.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-20  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-20  9:32 [PATCH V4 0/9] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Viresh Kumar
2017-03-24 15:44   ` Rob Herring
2017-04-10  9:25     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-10  9:50       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-12 16:49   ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]     ` <0a7146f9-72f1-317c-3aab-770a72462968-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-13  5:37       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-13 13:42         ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]           ` <3adbef6a-7b43-528f-e88f-c2121d30a5d3-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-17  5:27             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-18 16:01               ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-19 11:47                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-19 13:58                   ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]                     ` <9dee7c0d-e5f4-9fcd-3c92-bf7ec9d43a3b-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-20  5:25                       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-20  8:23                         ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-20  9:33                           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-20  9:51                           ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-20  9:43                         ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-20  9:52                           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-23 22:07                             ` Kevin Hilman
     [not found]                 ` <95aa4b97-4e1a-13bb-f4d8-982b778012ba-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 10:11                   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-26  4:32                   ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-04-26 13:55                     ` Mark Brown
2017-04-27  9:42                       ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-27 10:50                         ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-04-28  5:00                           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-28  9:44                             ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]                               ` <b3f5b62c-9423-98e4-d366-78186ab02fb9-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-28 11:12                                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-30 12:49                         ` Mark Brown
2017-05-03 11:21                           ` Sudeep Holla
2017-05-14  9:55                             ` Mark Brown
     [not found]   ` <e772e67a5445319bb8e0f312846ace666adc097f.1490001099.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-12 17:05     ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-13  5:50       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-13 13:43         ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-17  5:33           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-18 16:03             ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-19 10:12               ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 2/9] PM / Domains: Use OPP tables " Viresh Kumar
     [not found]   ` <5619ac7777689f282f8aafabbde22d71b46a979b.1490001099.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-12 16:58     ` Sudeep Holla
2017-04-13  6:03       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-13 13:45         ` Sudeep Holla
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 3/9] PM / QOS: Keep common notifier list for genpd constraints Viresh Kumar
2017-04-19 14:06   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-20  4:45   ` [PATCH V5 " Viresh Kumar
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 4/9] PM / QOS: Add DEV_PM_QOS_PERFORMANCE request Viresh Kumar
2017-04-19 14:07   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-20  4:34     ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-04-20  4:46   ` [PATCH V5 " Viresh Kumar
2017-04-20  6:53     ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 5/9] PM / OPP: Add support to parse OPP table for power-domains Viresh Kumar
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 6/9] PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_find_dps() helper Viresh Kumar
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 7/9] PM / domain: Register for PM QOS performance notifier Viresh Kumar
2017-04-20  4:46   ` [PATCH V5 " Viresh Kumar
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 8/9] PM / Domain: Add struct device to genpd Viresh Kumar
2017-03-20  9:32 ` [PATCH V4 9/9] PM / Domain: Add support to parse domain's OPP table Viresh Kumar
2017-04-12 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 0/9] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170420043402.GE5436@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox