From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpuidle: Replace ktime_get() with local_clock()"
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:07:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420130713.GD2523@mai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170420124447.13716-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:44:47PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> This reverts commit e93e59ce5b85e6c2b444f09fd1f707274ec066dc.
>
> The TSC stops in deeper C states, so using local_clock() in cpuidle
> to track the C state residency seems like a bad idea. With local_clock()
> powertop is reporting mostly 0% residency for C states here. Presumably
> the core is still spending most of its time in some deep C-state since
> the totals typically add up to only 5% or so, so perhaps the governor
> isn't getting totally confused by these bogus numbers. But let's go
> back to using ktime_get() as that at least works correctly across the
> board.
The local clock is faster, more accurate and more stable. We saw ktime_get()
can be expensive, especially on slower CPUs.
Why not add flag for the idle state to tell the local clocksource stops and use
in this case ktime_get() ?
This flag can be set on the idle state at init time in intel_idle.c around:
...
if (((mwait_cstate + 1) > 2) &&
!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC))
mark_tsc_unstable("TSC halts in idle"
" states deeper than C2");
...
and in processor_idlec.c around:
...
tsc_check_state(cx->type);
...
So we keep using local_clock() in most of the cases, for most of the boards.
> Note that the code has changed somewhat since the regression happened,
> so this isn't a 1:1 revert of the offending commit.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index 548b90be7685..24a52805527f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -213,13 +213,13 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> sched_idle_set_state(target_state);
>
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(index, dev->cpu);
> - time_start = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> + time_start = ktime_get();
>
> stop_critical_timings();
> entered_state = target_state->enter(dev, drv, index);
> start_critical_timings();
>
> - time_end = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> + time_end = ktime_get();
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
>
> /* The cpu is no longer idle or about to enter idle. */
> --
> 2.10.2
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 12:44 [PATCH] Revert "cpuidle: Replace ktime_get() with local_clock()" ville.syrjala
2017-04-20 13:07 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2017-04-20 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-20 13:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-04-20 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-20 14:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-04-20 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-20 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170420130713.GD2523@mai \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox