From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:17:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20170420141707.GA22057@infradead.org> References: <20170412230854.GA11963@fury> <20170419075248.GD18887@pali> <201704191854.51783@pali> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201704191854.51783@pali> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, dvhart@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, luto@amacapital.net, len.brown@intel.com, corentin.chary@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org With Andy's conversion of WMI to the driver model the GUIDs should be our device ids. Which means WMI can support the dynamic device ID model, where you can echo a id to sysfs to bind an id - that way people could add the GUIDs on demand to the pass through driver if they need them even with the whitelist approach.