From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:26:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20170424092635.oznzvugqxdisw7k7@dell> References: <0e4d82ca9cdc41c9d2a8b45258cd72659b4c2063.1492210847.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> <93377b77b9493d79de48741b030fa1b03f80094f.1492210847.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> <20170421220025.GC31650@fury> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170421220025.GC31650@fury> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Darren Hart Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, gnurou@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, andy@infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, sathyaosid@gmail.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Darren Hart wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > > > Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips > > By currently I believe you mean after the earlier patch in this series is > applied, correct? This one is dependent on the previous one? > > > are chained to the respective first level irqs. So there is no > > need for explicitly unmasking the first level irq in this > > driver. This patches removes this level 1 irq unmask support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > For platform drivers x86: > > Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) > > Are you working with a specific maintainers to pull this in as a series? With so > many subsystems, we need to coordinate to make sure we don't make a mess for > Linus. Given the interdependencies, I'd recommend someone pull the series in as > a whole - maybe into MFD? Lee, do you have a preference? I am happy to take the set, however I think v4.12 is an unlikely candidate, since there still have quite a few patches which are yet to receive review and the merge-window opens in 6 days. Once we have all the required Acks, I'll push the set into -next where it can sit for a good soak test until v4.13. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog