From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: cpufreq: enhance Mediatek cpufreq dt-binding document Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 12:36:46 +0530 Message-ID: <20170508070646.GE17010@vireshk-i7> References: <1493997974-17699-1-git-send-email-sean.wang@mediatek.com> <1493997974-17699-7-git-send-email-sean.wang@mediatek.com> <20170508042010.GD17010@vireshk-i7> <1494226711.9662.22.camel@mtkswgap22> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1494226711.9662.22.camel@mtkswgap22> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sean Wang Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, shunli.wang@mediatek.com, erin.lo@mediatek.com, jdelvare@suse.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 08-05-17, 14:58, Sean Wang wrote: > > > + opp@598000000 { > > > > s/opp@/opp-/ > > I have referred to other dt-binding as examples where they also use opp@ > as the prefix word. e.g bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt did it. > > Or I misunderstand something you pointed out here ? Its on the way: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149266711829469&w=2 -- viresh