From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
dvhart@infradead.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD, GPIO, Thermal and X86 due for the v4.13 merge window
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 07:57:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531065723.yhdgki6zgvbtmine@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAENHMvOFEh_57eFcHM-58i4vPso9-dPc5Y63cQ2Rm0jX2G=yKQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, 30 May 2017 09:53:06 +0100 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear fellow Maintainers,
> >>
> >> Enjoy!
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit 2ea659a9ef488125eb46da6eb571de5eae5c43f6:
> >>
> >> Linux 4.12-rc1 (2017-05-13 13:19:49 -0700)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git tags/ib-mfd-gpio-thermal-x86-v4.13
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to 6aa60f67c11c10540e43bbe5a6377f7a0231501e:
> >>
> >> platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask (2017-05-30 09:34:08 +0100)
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Immutable branch between MFD, GPIO, Thermal and X86 due for the v4.13 merge window
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan (8):
> >> mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use chained irqs for second level irq chips
> >
> > See my other bug report on this commit ...
>
> Sorry, its a mistake from my end. It looks like typec wcove driver got
> merged recently and I missed to add it to my cleanup patch set.
>
> Lee,
>
> I have created a patch to fix this issue.
>
> Do you want me to send the entire series again with this fix or just
> send the fix alone.
This highlights the fact that this patch-set is not actually
bisectable. To say that, when bisecting if we landed somewhere in the
middle of this set, we would receive build errors.
Ergo, this set is not actually acceptable in its current state.
Please squash all patches where you are a) changing the API (in the
MFD header), then b) transitioning users (child devices) over to it.
Ensure that you do not make any code changes and remember to move all
of the Acks you collected into the squashed patch. Also, please use
the $SUBJECT lines commonly used by particular subsystems. For MFD
the format is thus:
mfd: <device>: Patch description starting with an uppercase character
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-14 23:25 [PATCH v2 1/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: fix TMU interrupt index sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-14 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: remove thermal second level irqs sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-14 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: use first level PMIC thermal irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-22 10:17 ` Lee Jones
2017-05-22 19:08 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 6:24 ` Zhang Rui
2017-05-23 7:26 ` Lee Jones
2017-05-23 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: fix TMU interrupt index sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: remove thermal second level irqs sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: use first level PMIC thermal irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: remove second level irq for gpio device sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] gpio: gpio-wcove: use first level PMIC GPIO irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: utilize devm_* functions in driver probe sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: use chained irqs for second level irq chips sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-23 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-30 8:53 ` [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD, GPIO, Thermal and X86 due for the v4.13 merge window Lee Jones
2017-05-31 3:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-31 4:27 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
2017-05-31 4:29 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
2017-05-31 6:57 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2017-05-31 22:33 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-06-03 17:01 ` Darren Hart
2017-05-31 6:50 ` Lee Jones
2017-05-31 7:02 ` Lee Jones
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Add chained IRQ support sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Fix TMU interrupt index sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove thermal second level irqs sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: Use first level PMIC thermal irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-03 13:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-03 17:28 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
2017-06-03 17:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-03 17:53 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
2017-06-03 18:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-05 19:08 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Add chained IRQ support sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-05 19:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Fix TMU interrupt index sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-05 19:08 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove thermal second level IRQs sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-05 19:08 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove second level IRQ for gpio device sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-05 19:08 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Utilize devm_* functions in driver probe sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-05 19:08 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use chained IRQs for second level IRQ chips sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-06 9:29 ` Heikki Krogerus
2017-06-05 19:08 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] platform/x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: Remove first level IRQ unmask sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Add chained IRQ support Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-19 14:48 ` [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD and X86 due for the v4.13 merge window Lee Jones
2017-06-19 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-19 19:54 ` Darren Hart
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove second level irq for gpio device sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] gpio: gpio-wcove: Use first level PMIC GPIO irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-03 13:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use chained irqs for second level irq chips sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-03 13:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] platform/x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: Remove first level irq unmask sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-06-03 13:27 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Add chained IRQ support Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <cover.1496266871.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-31 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Utilize devm_* functions in driver probe sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
2017-06-03 13:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-04-14 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: remove second level irq for gpio device sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-14 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] gpio: gpio-wcove: use first level PMIC GPIO irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-24 13:17 ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-26 15:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-04-14 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: utilize devm_* functions in driver probe sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-24 12:03 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-14 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: use chained irqs for second level irq chips sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-24 12:04 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-14 23:26 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-21 22:00 ` Darren Hart
2017-04-21 22:34 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-04-22 2:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-04-24 9:24 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-24 9:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-04-24 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-26 15:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-04-24 9:26 ` Lee Jones
2017-05-30 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: fix TMU interrupt index Lee Jones
2017-05-30 18:00 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170531065723.yhdgki6zgvbtmine@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sathyaosid@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox