From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] thermal/cpu idle cooling: Introduce cpu idle cooling driver Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:52:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20170608075224.GN2345@mai> References: <1496653645-20283-1-git-send-email-kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com> <20170606034135.GA5103@vireshk-i7> <20170607215028.GL2345@mai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:35579 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751506AbdFHHwa (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 03:52:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id x70so71792657wme.0 for ; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Viresh Kumar , Tao Wang , "Zhang, Rui" , Eduardo Valentin , amit.kachhap@gmail.com, javi.merino@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM , sunzhaosheng@hisilicon.com, Vincent Guittot , jean.wangtao@linaro.org On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:59:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:11:35AM +0530, viresh kumar wrote: > >> + Daniel > > > > Hi Viresh, > > > > thanks for the head up. > > > > Before going deeply in the review, I have a dumb question: > > > > Why isn't this mechanism implemented at the scheduler level? > > I suppose for the same reason why intel_powerclamp is not implemented > like that: the scheduler maintainers don't like the idea. Ok, I see. Thanks. -- Daniel -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog