From: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LTC3651 and other GPIO chargers
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:38:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627063836.bp32zzxtf5ulu7dw@lenoch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b439c7f-4401-5333-a45f-2d2e243902c8@topic.nl>
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:39:21AM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 26-06-17 18:21, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > A driver for LTC3651 was recently added to -next
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9717049/
> > which brings a question whenever we want to add separate driver
> > (or vendor specific bindings) for ever growing list of similar
> > chargers. For example those using the same status output lines
> > are: BQ24232HA, LTC4007, LTM8061, RT9502, LT3651, LT3650, TP4056,
> > MAX1737...
> > Others for example BQ24032A and LM3658 (which I have to support)
> > are using different status encoding, ie. LM3658:
> >
> > stat1 stat2 Condition
> > 0 0 Power-Down, charging is suspended or interrupted
> > 1 0 Pre-qualification mode, CC and CV charging
> > 0 1 Charge is completed
> > 1 1 Bad battery (Safety timer expired), or LDO mode
> >
> > What about extending gpio-charger instead?
> > - allow gpio list fdt subnode
> > - consider each gpio line to represent bit in a word
> > - provide per property subnodes
> > - each subnode holds a mask and mapping to property values
> > This way we should be able to cover most chargers providing status
> > using gpios. Comments welcome and appreciated - those will turn into
> > implementation.
>
> It's an interesting idea, and while writing the ltc3651 driver, I was
> thinking along those lines already. However, there are only two gpio charger
> drivers now, so I didn't see the need yet.
>
> The table is an interesting approach. Something else to consider: Some gpio
> chargers allow control as well, e.g. pulling the "charging" ping low
> externally forces the charging to stop.
Yes, the aforementioned LM3658 chip is one of such chargers. We already
have charger-manager and gpio-regulator, but this doesn't seem to solve
this situation as it provides "software charger ic". So for now I'm
just misusing led class to enable charger - something which indeed needs
to be solved properly.
> Something that might help is to create a "GPIO charger" sub-menu in Kconfig,
> to make hunting for these drivers a bit easier.
I hope number of these driver will stop rising after we have one to rule
them all :-)
Best regards,
ladis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-26 16:21 LTC3651 and other GPIO chargers Ladislav Michl
2017-06-27 5:39 ` Mike Looijmans
2017-06-27 6:38 ` Ladislav Michl [this message]
2017-06-27 6:59 ` Mike Looijmans
2017-07-28 1:04 ` Ladislav Michl
2017-07-28 5:27 ` Mike Looijmans
2017-07-03 13:52 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-13 7:25 ` Ladislav Michl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170627063836.bp32zzxtf5ulu7dw@lenoch \
--to=ladis@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox