From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Find transition latency dynamically Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:28:44 +0530 Message-ID: <20170630035844.GW29665@vireshk-i7> References: <8041a965fcca71231576ae77a141b1e4333a81cc.1496402967.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20170629042836.GI29665@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Lists linaro-kernel , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Vincent Guittot List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 29-06-17, 22:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Shouldn't drivers do that really? Well they can, but the we will have some sort of code duplication then. Or else we can provide a helper for them to find this value dynamically and that would be fine too. And maybe we can add a callback for the cpufreq-driver, which can be filled by the generic helper and core can call it once at policy initialization time. -- viresh