From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:31:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705060136.GO3532@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499189651-18797-4-git-send-email-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
On 04-07-17, 18:34, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 004ae18..98704d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
> unsigned long util, max;
> unsigned int next_f;
> + bool rt_mode;
> bool busy;
>
> /* Skip updates generated by sugov kthreads */
> @@ -230,7 +231,15 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>
> busy = sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
>
> - if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL) {
> + /*
> + * While RT/DL tasks are running we do not want FAIR tasks to
> + * overvrite this CPU's flags, still we can update utilization and
> + * frequency (if required/possible) to be fair with these tasks.
> + */
> + rt_mode = task_has_dl_policy(current) ||
> + task_has_rt_policy(current) ||
> + (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL);
We may want to create a separate inline function for above, as it is already
used twice in this patch.
But I was wondering if we can get some help from the scheduler to avoid such
code here. I understand that we don't want to do the aggregation in the
scheduler to keep it clean and keep such governor specific thing here.
But what about clearing the sched-class's flag from .pick_next_task() callback
when they return NULL ?
What about something like this instead (completely untested), with which we
don't need the 2/3 patch as well:
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
index d2be2ccbb372..e81a6b5591f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL (1U << 1)
#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT (1U << 2)
+#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR (1U << 31)
+#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR_RT (SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR | SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
+#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR_DL (SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR | SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL)
+
#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL (SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT | SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL)
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 076a2e31951c..f32e15d59d62 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
unsigned int next_f;
bool busy;
+ if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR)
+ return;
+
sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
sg_cpu->last_update = time;
@@ -296,7 +299,13 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
sg_cpu->util = util;
sg_cpu->max = max;
- sg_cpu->flags = flags;
+
+ if (unlikely(flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR)) {
+ sg_cpu->flags &= ~(flags & ~SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ sg_cpu->flags |= flags;
sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
sg_cpu->last_update = time;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index a2ce59015642..441d6153d654 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1203,8 +1203,10 @@ pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (prev->sched_class == &dl_sched_class)
update_curr_dl(rq);
- if (unlikely(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running))
+ if (unlikely(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running)) {
+ cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR_DL);
return NULL;
+ }
put_prev_task(rq, prev);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 979b7341008a..bca9e4bb7ec4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1556,8 +1556,10 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (prev->sched_class == &rt_sched_class)
update_curr_rt(rq);
- if (!rt_rq->rt_queued)
+ if (!rt_rq->rt_queued) {
+ cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR_RT);
return NULL;
+ }
put_prev_task(rq, prev);
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-04 17:34 [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-05 5:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-05 11:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 4:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-06 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-07-11 19:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-05 4:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-05 13:04 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 5:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-07 4:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-07 10:17 ` Juri Lelli
2017-07-11 19:16 ` Saravana Kannan
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-05 6:01 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-07-05 13:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 5:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-07 5:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-07 5:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-07 6:44 ` Vikram Mulukutla
2017-07-08 6:14 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-10 17:49 ` Vikram Mulukutla
2017-07-11 5:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170705060136.GO3532@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=andresoportus@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).