From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:01:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719080115.GN10026@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718170001.GD3981@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [170718 10:00]:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:41:38PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [170717 05:40]:
> > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:08:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> [170716 16:25]:
> > > > > I reused the rcu_irq_enter_irqson() from RCU_NONIDLE to avoid this issue.
> > > > > It works fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tony, Could you like to give a tested-by if this patch works for you.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah that keeps things booting for me with no splats so:
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > > >
> > > > In general, it seems we're missing the knowledge in Linux kernel
> > > > of when the entire system is idle. Right now it seems that only
> > > > cpuidle_coupled knows that?
> > > >
> > > > We could probably simplify things by adding some PM state for
> > > > entire system idle. Then cpuidle code and timer code could use
> > > > that to test when it's safe to do whatever the SoC needs to do
> > > > to enter deeper power states.
> > > >
> > > > If we already have something like that, please do let me know :)
> > >
> > > Well, we used to have CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE, which detected
> > > full-system idle lazily so as to avoid scalability bottlenecks.
> > > https://lwn.net/Articles/558284/
> > >
> > > No one was using it, so I removed it last merge window. The
> > > patch that removed it is at sysidle.2017.05.11a, which can
> > > probably still be reverted cleanly. Or just use v4.11 or earlier.
> >
> > OK thanks for the pointer, for reference that commit is
> > fe5ac724d81a ("rcu: Remove nohz_full full-system-idle state
> > machine").
> >
> > For a potential user, I think we could use it for example in
> > cpuidle_enter_state_coupled() + omap_enter_idle_coupled() where
> > we try to figure out if the system is fully idle before calling
> > tick_broadcast_enter().
>
> Would you be willing to prototype your usage on v4.12? It still has
> NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE. You have to enable NO_HZ_FULL in order to enable
> NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE at the moment.
>
> Either way, here is the important bit for usage:
>
> bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void);
> void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void);
>
> The rcu_sys_is_idle() function returns true if all CPUs other than the
> time-keeping CPU (that is, tick_do_timer_cpu, which is usually CPU 0)
> are in their idle loop. Of course, if you invoke rcu_sys_is_idle()
> from any CPU other than the time-keeping CPU, you will automatically
> get a return value of false.
>
> RCU's idle-exit code already sets state appropriately, but if there
> is some other circumstance where you need to force the state machine
> out of all-CPUs-idle state, you can call rcu_sysidle_force_exit().
OK sure I'll take a look at some point.
Thanks,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-13 7:07 Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Tony Lindgren
2017-07-13 9:43 ` Alex Shi
2017-07-13 11:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-07-13 12:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-16 23:24 ` Alex Shi
2017-07-17 6:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-17 12:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-18 5:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-18 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-19 8:01 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2017-07-27 9:55 ` Alex Shi
2017-07-27 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170719080115.GN10026@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).