From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
WaldemarRymarkiewiczwaldemar.rymarkiewicz@gmail.com,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Fix get sharing cpus when hotplug is used
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:44:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721041404.GM352@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170720140237.6296-1-waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com>
On 20-07-17, 16:02, Waldemar Rymarkiewicz wrote:
> On systems where not all possible CPUs are available for Linux, call to
> dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() will fail as cannot find a cpu device
s/fail/we fail/
> for not present (offline) CPUs.
not-present != offline. But above kind of says so. We need to only say
that the CPUs aren't present yet, i.e. hotplugged out.
>
> Example (real use case):
> 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available
> for linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + opp v2 fail to register opp_table
> due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup).
>
> More generally, this is a problem for all platforms that use cpu hotplugging.
>
> Iterating over cpu device nodes instead of cpu device struct solves this
> problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
So, this kind of means that you are abandoning your earlier patch as
that isn't required anymore? You should have marked it as V2 here and
provided a changelog.
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> index 57eec1c..28348d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> @@ -248,15 +248,21 @@ void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table);
>
> -/* Returns opp descriptor node for a device, caller must do of_node_put() */
> -struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(struct device *dev)
> +/* Returns opp descriptor node for a device node, caller must do of_node_put() */
> +static struct device_node *_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(struct device_node *np)
> {
> /*
> * There should be only ONE phandle present in "operating-points-v2"
> * property.
> */
>
> - return of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "operating-points-v2", 0);
> + return of_parse_phandle(np, "operating-points-v2", 0);
> +}
> +
> +/* Returns opp descriptor node for a device, caller must do of_node_put() */
> +struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return _opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(dev->of_node);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node);
>
> @@ -572,8 +578,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table);
> int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev,
> struct cpumask *cpumask)
> {
> - struct device_node *np, *tmp_np;
> - struct device *tcpu_dev;
> + struct device_node *np, *tmp_np, *cpu_np;
> int cpu, ret = 0;
>
> /* Get OPP descriptor node */
> @@ -593,18 +598,18 @@ int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev,
> if (cpu == cpu_dev->id)
> continue;
>
> - tcpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> - if (!tcpu_dev) {
> - dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: failed to get cpu%d device\n",
> + cpu_np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> + if (!cpu_np) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: failed to get cpu%d node\n",
> __func__, cpu);
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> goto put_cpu_node;
> }
>
> /* Get OPP descriptor node */
> - tmp_np = dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(tcpu_dev);
> + tmp_np = _opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(cpu_np);
> if (!tmp_np) {
> - dev_err(tcpu_dev, "%s: Couldn't find opp node.\n",
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: Couldn't find opp node.\n",
> __func__);
> ret = -ENOENT;
> goto put_cpu_node;
> --
> 2.10.1
Diff looks fine though.
--
viresh
parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20170720140237.6296-1-waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170721041404.GM352@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=WaldemarRymarkiewiczwaldemar.rymarkiewicz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
--cc=waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox