From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] drivers base/arch_topology: free cpumask cpus_to_visit
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:56:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170801105655.bxfuv7pkvb47notl@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170728072146.GY352@vireshk-i7>
Hi Greg,
On 28/07/17 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-07-17, 20:33, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > Free cpumask cpus_to_visit in case registering
> > init_cpu_capacity_notifier has failed or the parsing of the cpu
> > capacity-dmips-mhz property is done. The cpumask cpus_to_visit is
> > only used inside the notifier call init_cpu_capacity_callback.
> >
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> > Reported-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> > Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
This is actually a fix/optimization which is orthogonal to the rest of
the set. Would it make sense to take only this for now and keep
reviewing the other patches?
Thanks,
- Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-27 19:33 [PATCH v3 00/10] arm, arm64, cpufreq: frequency- and cpu-invariant accounting support for task scheduler Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] drivers base/arch_topology: free cpumask cpus_to_visit Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-28 7:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-08-01 10:56 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] cpufreq: provide default frequency-invariance setter function Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-28 7:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-08-02 12:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] cpufreq: arm_big_little: invoke " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-28 8:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] cpufreq: dt: " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-28 8:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drivers base/arch_topology: provide frequency-invariant accounting support Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-28 8:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drivers base/arch_topology: allow inlining cpu-invariant " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-28 8:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] arm: wire frequency-invariant accounting support up to the task scheduler Dietmar Eggemann
2017-08-14 13:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] arm: wire cpu-invariant " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-08-14 13:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: wire frequency-invariant " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-07-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] arm64: wire cpu-invariant " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-08-02 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] arm, arm64, cpufreq: frequency- and cpu-invariant accounting support for " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-08-04 17:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170801105655.bxfuv7pkvb47notl@e106622-lin \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).