From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: augment Ux500 to use DT cpufreq Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:56:56 +0530 Message-ID: <20170816032656.GC4233@vireshk-i7> References: <20170810125221.25818-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20170810125221.25818-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20170811051515.GD3638@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:35305 "EHLO mail-pf0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255AbdHPD07 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 23:26:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t86so803214pfe.2 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Lee Jones , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Ulf Hansson On 13-08-17, 14:23, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > For example, below will fail cpufreq on your board. You can try that > > to make sure I am not dreaming. > > > > - Compile cpufreq-dt as a module. > > - Boot the board. > > - Offline CPU0 (i.e. Keep only CPU1 online). > > - Boom, cpufreq failed. > > > > This will happen because the CPU1 doesn't have the operating-points > > and other properties. We should have them in all the CPUs. > > I don't think that will be a problem because CPU0 cannot be > taken offline on this system. Should be fine then. -- viresh