Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] bq27xxx_battery data memory update

[Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2216 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:12PM -0700, Liam Breck wrote:
> I don't see a Julia in CC list...

<_< let's try that again.

> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Sebastian Reichel
> <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> > [adding Julia to Cc for Coccinelle question]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:31:57AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> >> On 08/29/2017 05:54 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 08:36:12PM -0700, Liam Breck wrote:
> >> >> Overview:
> >> >> * Reorganizes chip data definitions
> >> >> * Enables features landed in these patches:
> >> >>   dt-bindings: power: supply: bq27xxx: Add monitored-battery documentation
> >> >>   power: supply: bq27xxx: Add chip data memory read/write support
> >> >>   power: supply: bq27xxx: Add power_supply_battery_info support
> >> >> * Supports the following chips (only BQ27425 is active)
> >> >>   BQ27500, 545, 425, 421, 441, 621
> >> >>
> >> >> Changes in v3:
> >> >> * BQ27425 tested; workaround minor chip bug
> >> >> * Dropped driver_version
> >> >> * Fixed dbg_dupes logic for .props & .dm_regs
> >> >> * Dropped two props array dupes
> >> >>
> >> >> Changes in v2:
> >> >> * Added di->opts flags for remaining chip features
> >> >> * Commented out untested bq27xxx_dm_regs parameters
> >> >> * Changed dbg_dupes to run only once
> >> >>
> >> >> Notes on v1:
> >> >> * Not fully tested (hence RFC tag)
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, full series queued.
> >> >
> >> > -- Sebastian
> >>
> >> Anyway, I've not got the time to fight these changes anymore, but at
> >> very least could you drop 4/5, it's static analysis code made into a
> >> runtime check built into a kernel driver, if not at least add my
> >> nacked-by. :)
> >
> > Since it's not critical at all and nobody depends on it, I dropped 4/5
> > for now. I agree, that checking it at runtime is not nice. On the other
> > hand I do think a duplication check makes sense. Doing a static
> > check should be possible, but I have no idea how to implement this
> > (without much effort). I suspect Coccinelle can do it, so I added
> > Julia.
> >
> > For reference this is the runtime check:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9918953/
>
> [...]

-- Sebastian

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]