From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH ] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: kfree opp_data when failure Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:06:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20171004053642.GA8478@vireshk-i7> References: <1506496097-30852-1-git-send-email-zumeng.chen@windriver.com> <20170927174026.GB12211@ubuntu> <7b7315f0-c2e4-a09e-8769-2d15a167fa73@windriver.com> <20170928041933.GG12211@ubuntu> <7a2171a3-d594-7fd7-2ccf-75ef7110dd98@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:51183 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751049AbdJDFgq (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2017 01:36:46 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id m63so5743319pfk.7 for ; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 22:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a2171a3-d594-7fd7-2ccf-75ef7110dd98@windriver.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Zumeng Chen Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, d-gerlach@ti.com, tony@atomide.com On 28-09-17, 13:00, Zumeng Chen wrote: > Yes, you are right, it seems of_node_put(np) that you mentioned were > ignored by both paths. If you don't mind I can deliver a separate patch > to fix this based on some testing later. Yeah, that's exactly how I want it. -- viresh