From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramesh Thomas Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: ladder: Add per CPU PM QoS resume latency support Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:33:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20171019233340.GA13902@intel.com> Reply-To: ramesh.thomas@intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, alex.shi@linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Individual CPUs may have special requirements to not enter deep idle states. For example, a CPU running real time applications would not want to enter deep idle states to avoid latency impacts. At the same time other CPUs that do not have such a requirement could allow deep idle states to save power. This was already implemented in the menu governor. Implementing similar changes in the ladder governor which gets selected when CONFIG_NO_HZ and CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE are not set. Refer following commits for the menu governor changes. commit 9908859acaa9 ("cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration") commit 6dbf5cea05a7 ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid taking spinlock for accessing QoS values") Signed-off-by: Ramesh Thomas --- drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c index ce1a2ff..f7cfee7 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -67,10 +68,16 @@ static int ladder_select_state(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev) { struct ladder_device *ldev = this_cpu_ptr(&ladder_devices); + struct device *device = get_cpu_device(dev->cpu); struct ladder_device_state *last_state; int last_residency, last_idx = ldev->last_state_idx; int first_idx = drv->states[0].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING ? 1 : 0; int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY); + int resume_latency = dev_pm_qos_raw_read_value(device); + + /* resume_latency is 0 means no restriction */ + if (resume_latency && resume_latency < latency_req) + latency_req = resume_latency; /* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */ if (unlikely(latency_req == 0)) { -- 2.7.4