From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:17:04 +0530 Message-ID: <20171116024704.GQ3257@vireshk-i7> References: <761f7963-8b6d-b002-5404-a9ad0acf84d6@linaro.org> <20171115154311.GA3005@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:52630 "EHLO mail-pg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754551AbdKPCrH (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:47:07 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j16so13979565pgn.9 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:47:07 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Eduardo Valentin , Daniel Lezcano , Rafael Wysocki , Amit Daniel Kachhap , Javi Merino , Zhang Rui , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Linux PM , Vincent Guittot , lukasz.luba@arm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Javi Merino , Punit Agrawal On 15-11-17, 19:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > However, I would like to see a clear declaration from whoever is > maintaining that code today that there is a plan in place to upstream > it and that this plan will actually be acted on. And, better yet, > *when* that can be expected to happen. Exactly what I have been advocating. And there is bunch of other places where such examples can be seen. For example multiple regulator support in the OPP framework, which I added an year ago hasn't seen a user yet. And I am pushing the TI guys (who wanted it badly) to upstream their code before we remove that as well :) Again, someone has to come up and take responsibility of getting static power platform support upstream in a definite amount of time. -- viresh